Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

"I will only work for JPMorgan, Citi, or Bank of America. This is why"

Times have changed in investment banking. I've been in this industry since before the 2008 financial crisis, and the range of safe seats has dwindled more and more. 

Get Morning Coffee  in your inbox. Sign up here.

When I graduated and looked for my first job, there was a range of tier one banks to apply to. They included Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley, but there was also Citi, Barclays, UBS, Credit Suisse, BNP Paribas, Bank of America and Deutsche Bank. And then there were tier two European banks and a range of smaller tier three players like Numis and Liberum.

The options then were wide, and so were the jobs on offer. If you didn't want to work in M&A, you could try equity or debt capital markets, broking and leveraged finance. And that was even before the wide range of jobs on offer in sales and trading. 

Times have changed. I work in debt capital markets and I will only work for Citi, JPMorgan and - maybe - Bank of America.

At other tier one banks, like Morgan Stanley, I think jobs are just too insecure. One minute you're there, the next you're not. They're full of people earning over £300k in the mid-ranks and it's difficult to justify their continued employment. 

Tier two banks are full of people who are intellectually subpar. They have fancy titles but are fundamentally engaged in things like mid-market lending repackaged as financial innovation. They're experts at LinkedIn self-promotion but lack sharpness and dynamism. And when you interview for those roles, you realise they're paid terribly.

I have tried to build my career down the middle path. I don't earn as much as at a major bank. I don't originate deals. But I am an expert in my niche, and I am indispensable to my deal team. Most days I work 14-16 hours, and I am OK with this. 

There are sacrifices to this approach. I do miss the pay in origination, but I don't miss the feeling that I was being paid far too much for checking credit books and running a process that any smart analyst could do just as easily. 

For the moment, I have no plans to move. There's a limited subset of jobs that I'd be willing to take. In the long term, I aspire to either make managing director via my niche role, or maybe to move to a buy-side credit firm. 

If you want to build a long term career in banking now, you need to be focused. If not, you risk coming to a premature end. There are far too many people piggybacking on the latest trends and claiming credit for work they have not done. This is not what I want to be.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: +44 7537 182250 (SMS, Whatsapp or voicemail). Telegram: @SarahButcher. Signal: sarahbutcher.22  Click here to fill in our anonymous form, or email editortips@efinancialcareers.com. Signal also available.

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libellous (in which case it won’t.)

Photo by Brendan Church on Unsplash

 

author-card-avatar
AUTHORLeo Atkinson Insider Comment
  • N_
    N_R
    16 July 2025
    Hi Leo, Your article stands out as, I think, one of more helpful ones on efinancialcareers, when it comes to discussing career / firm / seat risk-rewards. I note that you said you had a particular niche, which is strategically one of the most coherent paths to take, IMHO. I'd just add that, in finance, we're all at a different point on the spectrum between being a generalist and a specialist. I'm very much a specialist, and while that has put me at risk when my skillset is not in favor in the cycle, the network of people in my orbit (co-workers, former co-workers, and clients) has taken care of me over the years. I've had some tough job hunts, but they've always proved fruitful, and usually with ultimately better pay. Also, you touch on the temptation of international firms which, in my niche, are almost, like clockwork, once a decade or so, notorious for making an entry and then an exit into the market. The Japanese banks in particular always seem to want what they don't have in a different region, and then pay people marvelously to get it, and then lay them off when they can't brook the expense anymore. But those can be some big salaries, while they last!
  • Ba
    Badass banker
    4 July 2025
    I don’t agree that Morgan Stanley is the only ‘risky’ bank and other slow old banks who look harmless aren’t. On the contrary when you are working for a big bank you at least get a good severance. Which most of the competent people would die for as they can get a job anywhere and would love the bulk cash. Of course if you are outdated and not hot in market then its better you retire.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.